Slave stables

[BDSM_Tourguide]

Not sure if I should start a new thread for this question:

What about the doms who are poly online, but lead each and every one of their subs to believe that she is the only one?

Do we say he's keeping a stable? Being unfaithful if the others don't know?

Nightstriker/Moderator - if these questions belong elsewhere please move to a new thread. Thanks, Ruby

I'd say this is a fine place for those questions, since it is still in essence along the same lines as the original.

The difference between cheating and consent is knowledge. If a dominant has more than one submissive, even online, and isn't telling each of them about the others, then he's cheating.

He is keeping a stable, but he's also being unfaithful to all of him through his dishonesty.

[Jadetiger]

I'd say this is a fine place for those questions, since it is still in essence along the same lines as the original.

The difference between cheating and consent is knowledge. If a dominant has more than one submissive, even online, and isn't telling each of them about the others, then he's cheating.

He is keeping a stable, but he's also being unfaithful to all of him through his dishonesty.

Ruby always asked the hard questions. I never really gave the subject much thought. I just assume my master had other subs. He has never really talked about anyone specific but he had brought up how others have reacted to some of his tasks. On the other hand as a Domme I have one sub who is my pet. I interact with several others but do not give then near as much attention as I do my pet. He is aware that I do alot of roleplay but I never really asked him how he felt about it.

TG,
You have given me something to think about. I guess in the broad sense of the word I have stable. My pet probaly has a better idea of my activies than I do of my masters. I guess I need to find out how he feels about it. Then decide if I am going to be noisy and ask my master if he has other as well.

[Finding_Fantasy]

I have no problem, personally, with poly relationships. Because TG persues other relationships with other submissives I do not consider it cheating. Why? Because we discuss with each other first of it would be a good thing to both of us for him to continue with it. Normally, it has to be with someone that I can get along with.

Stables, as a whole, I am not sure I agree with because it just seems so impersonal. Kind of like a harem. Just something about it that leaves something to be desired.

[Ruby]

I asked:

What about the doms who are poly online, but lead each and every one of their subs to believe that she is the only one?

Do we say he's keeping a stable? Being unfaithful if the others don't know?

TG: Thanks. I think you summed up what I was feeling when I asked this question.

Jadetiger: I'm so glad your pet and master know what you've been up to. Though you don't try to hide anything. You've got enough threads going that we can all learn for your great experiences.

FF: Valuable insight here, thank you.

Alura: Remind me not to mess with you, ever!
While revenge is a dish best served cold, I'd rather not have to serve it for dinner.

Anyone else care to take a stab at these tough questions?

[learningtopleez]

I'd say this is a fine place for those questions, since it is still in essence along the same lines as the original.

The difference between cheating and consent is knowledge. If a dominant has more than one submissive, even online, and isn't telling each of them about the others, then he's cheating.

He is keeping a stable, but he's also being unfaithful to all of him through his dishonesty.

I agree 100% with you TG...it is amazing to me that people still think they can get away with it, especially on a site such as this. We have a lot of newcomers to the forums, but some of you (and me too) have been around here awhile...long enough to make good friends and maybe even play a little. I think that all those newcomers who are here to flirt only should say so. It's not a bad thing to flirt with several different people. It is wrong though to make each one of them think they are the only one that you would talk to like this. Or to tell one of them that you have formally chosen them as your own, then go and send "pussy meltdown" PM's to other forum members. And yes I'm once again speaking from experience! For all I know he sent the same PM to each of us...so beware all! And could someone please help me to stop being so fucking naive?? Oh well...live and learn, huh?

~ltp~